Sunday, May 4, 2014

Final Reflection

Over the past couple of years as a new teacher, I have attended a multitude of professional development sessions for Teach for America and for the district, as well as taken classes in the Education and Social Change program, and the majority of these experiences have left me with little useful, concrete knowledge to implement in my classroom. However, this class did not fall into this category. For the first time as a Spanish teacher, I was able to use the strategies and information that I learned.
            First, learning how to backwards plan a unit was very helpful. Teach for America had thrown around the term “backwards planning” before, but they had never actually walked us through the steps of how to do it. Having the literature and classroom discussion to guide us helped me to design a unit plan that I was actually able to use in my classroom with the novel that I was about to teach in my Spanish for Spanish speakers class.
            In particular, the Smagorinsky reading on the different types of final assessments helped me to think outside of the box in my unit planning. Rather than just give my students a final exam on the content of novel, I had them prepare for an analytic essay that was focused on the picaresque genre. Throughout our reading of the novel Lazarillo de Tormes, my students practiced finding and explaining quotes that illustrated the characteristics of the picaresque genre so that by the time they got to the final assessment, they were able to discuss at least three characteristics of this genre and use textual evidence to support their claim. In this way, students were less focused on remembering every detail of the novel’s events and more focused on understanding the cultural and historical importance of the novel in 16th century Spain and the precedence it set as the first novel of this genre. Taking this “big picture” approach to my unit plan helped me to accomplish one of my goals as a Spanish teacher, which was to teach Spanish as a means of understanding the cultural context of the language.
            In addition to helping me restructure my planning process to help me reach my instructional goals, this class helped me to make my lessons more student-centered and therefore more engaging. Because I had to carefully design lesson plans as part of my unit plan, I took the time to think of more student-centered activities to include in them. For example, I started off the unit by having students do a jigsaw and be the experts on one characteristic of the picaresque novel that they would have to explain to the class. Rather than spoon-feeding notes to the students, I had them work in groups to do their own research using the study materials in the back of the book. Therefore, coming up with the notes on the genre characteristics was a student-led process. Also, many of my writing prompts throughout the reading of the novel involved student choice. Students would often get a topic to write about but they would be able to choose which scene or character to focus on. Making my class more student-centered as a result of the readings and discussions we had in this class made my overall experience as a teacher more enjoyable. I did more work in the planning process but was more of a facilitator in the classroom, which was a much more interesting role because I got to hear my students’ thoughts more and learn about them as people.

            Finally, I feel that I learned more in this class than in other classes in the program because of its structure. A lot of the classes we have taken thus far have been very general in their content because we have students who teach various grade levels and subjects. Being in small groups based on our content and grade level helped us to hone in on the challenges that we face in our content at the high school level and build more content-specific knowledge. In this setting, I feel like I was able to learn from the professor and my colleagues about new strategies that were applicable to my classroom. In addition, the more intimate setting allowed for us to share more of our own ideas and teaching style with our classmates. For example, when each of us presented an article or video about an issue in education, I found myself thinking about factors that affect my students that I had never examined in depth before. In addition, when we did our lesson presentations, I was able to pick up ideas from other people that I hadn’t used previously and that work well in a language classroom, like Whitney’s use of a popular song to introduce a theme. Finally, I liked that our professor had experience working in an ETO school because our discussions felt more relevant to the setting in which we work. When an idea was brought up that would be challenging to implement in the rigid structure of our schools, we discussed how we could modify it to attempt to make it work. In this way, we were constantly considering the realities of the environment in which we teach rather than focusing on idealistic hypotheticals.

Thursday, May 1, 2014

Final Course Reflection- The Unit Planning Process

Theresa Thomas
Unit plan reflection

Upon reflecting on my growth as a teacher, it is clear that TAL 541 has been a significant factor. This semester has been very informative. I have been able to use a multitude of the strategies and best practices learned in my daily instruction. Not only is my planning more purposeful, my lessons are more student centered, and my students are more engaged. Creating a unit plan and receiving literature to support me in doing so, as well as the immediate feedback was what really helped me grow.
Early in the semester we began the task of backwards planning a unit. While this is a concept I am familiar with through my affiliation with TFA, this course helped me understand how to effectively backwards plan. Teaching in a failing school for the past three  years has stifled my creativity as a teacher. My teacher training program through Teach For America consisted of backwards planning from the statewide assessment, the FCAT. We were taught to be standards based. Everything we did aligned to the standards, so I spent a lot of time teaching kids the benchmarks in isolation. For the most part, I used very simple FCAT like passages that were not very rigorous or interesting. My students were very disengaged, and when I did try to implement rigorous passages and spark creative thinking, I was not sure how to scaffold my students to that point. There was a lot of trial and error, with no real feedback. This changed after reading Peter Smagorinsky's Teaching English Through Principled Practice. Through Smagorinsky's book I was able to learn about backwards planning a theme for the year, as well as for each unit. I learned the culminating assessment can be a wide variety of activities as opposed to a multiple choice test with a few short answer responses. I chose a portfolio assessment for my unit on "Black Boy". This would allow my students the freedom to choose the work they were most proud of at the end of the unit and be able to display it. This also pushed me to be creative in choosing my activities each week. I wanted to give my students a plethora of assignments to choose from. Professor Perez was also instrumental in providing feedback and suggestions that helped shape my vision.
After creating the culminating assessment I began lesson planning. I used Warner and Lovell's book, Teaching Writing Grades 7-12, and Smagorinsky's Teaching English Through Principled Practice to find student centered activities to incorporate in to my lessons. One strategy that worked well for my students was the response logs, also known as double journal entries.These entries were used as a response to the novel my students were reading. At the end of each selection of text, students could choose how they wanted to respond to the text. They always had to write a summary, but the second part could be an analysis of mood, tone, or the students could create questions that would be shared in class. Upon completing the response logs, students would share their response with their group members, generating student led discussions around the text. This is just one of the strategies I incorporated. I really enjoyed learning new ways to unit plan and engage my students.
Another thing that was extremely beneficial was the group lesson plan incorporating elements of Systemic Functional Linguistics. This was used to help students improve their comprehension of text as well as their writing. In learning about Systemic Functional Linguistics, it became extremely clear why my students are struggling to comprehend grade level text. The text is very complex, meaning the sentences are lengthier, embedding multiple clauses, and descriptions, making it harder for students to comprehend. The sentences no longer just contain an easily identifiable subject and predicate in which students are use to. I never really knew how to aid students in comprehending the text until we learned more about SFL. Previously, I was providing a lot of background knowledge and leading children to my understanding of the text. SFL is a tool to aid students in breaking down the text in to meaningful chunks of information. Additionally, analyzing the breakdown in text and the language features of each genre can help transform their writing, by giving them tools to add more details. While we just scratched the surface with SFL, I hope to learn more over the summer so I can begin implementing it with fidelity next year.